cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 15 days agoPeakdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down10
arrow-up14arrow-down1imagePeakdiscuss.tchncs.decronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squarecouldhavebeenyou@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·15 days agoIt’s important not to conflate the attack on Iraq with NATO. Not that many nations were dumb enough to follow Bush into that one
minus-squareEnkrod@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·14 days agoStill, many members of the “willing” were NATO members, so NATO servicemen lost their lives for a US war.
minus-squarecouldhavebeenyou@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·14 days agoMost NATO members weren’t part of that ‘coalition’, and most members of that coalition weren’t NATO members. So I think it’s at the very least a bit disingenious to try and rub those two things together
It’s important not to conflate the attack on Iraq with NATO. Not that many nations were dumb enough to follow Bush into that one
Still, many members of the “willing” were NATO members, so NATO servicemen lost their lives for a US war.
Most NATO members weren’t part of that ‘coalition’, and most members of that coalition weren’t NATO members. So I think it’s at the very least a bit disingenious to try and rub those two things together