• 3abas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    You have no principals, if you did, you’d oppose those directly in opposition of your principals.

    Instead you call evil imperfect because it doesn’t harm you and yours. You’re part of the problem, you’re why the Democrats feel comfortable running a campaign to the right of GWB’s, 20 more years and you’d be voting for everything Trump is doing today and calling it imperfect.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        What’s looney tunes about having principals and not supporting those who oppose them?

        Do you have something to actually say in response, or are you simply satisfied with calling it crazy?

        Do you disagree that Kamala Harris was further to the right of GWB on trade? On asylum and border crosses? On energy? Calling as a “left candidate” for the “most lethal military” to big applause?

        Do you disagree that the Democrats are further right than 20 years ago? The shift to bootlicking and police worshiping? Do you not see what they actually fund and vote for in between using minorites in rhetoric about human rights and equality? Did you miss how they completely moved on from roe v wade?

        If you have leftist principals, you don’t support candidates who directly oppose them, just because the other candidate opposes them more. Prop up your own candidate who supports your principals even if they have no chance at winning, because it’s crucial to keep your principals in the conversation. Once they’re out of the conversation, good luck getting the masses thinking about them again.

      • beella@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I mean, you’re the moron who thinks that a candidate who supports the working class is ‘perfect.’