• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah, it wasn’t actually balanced as in not spending more money than being made. It was balanced as it was no longer accelerating. Like instead of taking on $2000 of debt when you took out $1500 in debt last year, you only took out $1500 more debt this year. So the debt was still increasing, just not faster than before. (Which is fine still as long as the money being borrowed is making more money than what you borrowed it at.)

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Uh…W made a huge deal about giving back the surplus with those tax refund checks. Sent everyone a picture of him and his wife along with it. You don’t do that over “smaller deficit”

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah but a republican might. You have to understand that they’re ideologically opposed to the government having and using money. Even in places they demand government attempt to turn a profit like USPS and Amtrak (which I’m theoretically not opposed to them doing if they provide vital services at a good price and quality) it’s with the ultimate goal of spinning them off into private companies

        • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          But my point is, we DID HAVE A SURPLUS. For about 4 years. Then W gave it away THEN started multiple trillion dollar two decades long wars