Over the last week, the guide has surged to become the 5th-most-accessed book on Project Gutenberg, an open source repository of free and public domain ebooks. It is also the fifth most popular ebook on the site over the last 30 days, having been accessed nearly 60,000 times over the last month (just behind Romeo and Juliet).

Direct link to the book (without the backref):

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/26184

  • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Hell yeah! This is great! I’m glad I’m not the only one sharing it around to friends and neighbors. True resistance is not the flashy stuff; it’s a whole of society approach to stop fascists in their tracks. True resistance is the sum total of small acts to inconvenience and impede a fascist.

    • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      The thing is that these techniques were intended to be used in hostile opponent countries, not your own.

      “Shut down America” isn’t a goal any American should have - instead, work to make a positive difference.

  • satans_methpipe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Ignore this document. It’s a plant.

    It suggests filing metal containers that contain gasoline. They just want to see who shows up in ERs or local police dept with specific injuries or vandalism charges.

    Edit: the anarchist cookbook that circulated in the 90s and 2000s was a false flag that was intended to remove fingers, hands, and entire faces. It was a funded attempt to get ‘smart people’ to blow their hands off. The doc posted by OP has the same hallmark copy-paste from reputable sources mixed with advice from chaos agents.

      • satans_methpipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Grinding metal can create large voltage potentials which can create arcs which can ignite gasoline vapor which can cause an explosion.

        More to the point, i’m commenting on semi competent text followed by suicide advice. I stopped reading to make my previous post. I’ll pick back up to see if there are any more obvious points.

  • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I don’t spot the difference between this and how most modern day corporations are operated:

    • “To lower morale and with it, production, be pleasant to inefficient workers; give them undeserved promotions. Discriminate against efficient workers; complain unjustly about their work.”
    • “Hold conferences when there is more critical work to be done.”
    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      “To lower morale and with it, production, be pleasant to inefficient workers; give them undeserved promotions. Discriminate against efficient workers; complain unjustly about their work.”

      So is this why DEI exists?

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        DEI exists because racists often have hiring power. It doesn’t force the hiring of the unqualified, it supports the qualified from not being discriminated against.

        Nice “centrism” btw.

        • nifty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          So riddle me this, why is it hard to believe that DEI type policies could be plot by some organization or country against the U.S. when there’s literally a field manual which says that such policies should be used against “fascists”. People on Lemmy call the U.S. imperialist all the time.

          • Banana@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            The flaw in your argument is the false equivalency between minorities (people the DEI programs are there to support) and “inefficient workers”.

            Are straight white dudes exempt from ever being considered inefficient? That’s silly.

            • nifty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              No, I didn’t say minorities, you’re assuming that. I was pointing out the part in the text which says, “fight fascists by creating bureaucracy”. There are lots of articles already which point out that DEI is for all identities, not just POC.

              • Banana@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                I didn’t say POC anywhere in my comment.

                These identities are minority identities. Women, POC, LGBT+ communities are all considered minorities. There are legitimate reasons for DEI, including increasing efficiency in workplaces, which doesn’t line up here, because in this doc the increase in bureaucracy is for the purpose of decreasing efficiency.

                Some studies I’d like to cite regarding my claim on Diversity practices increasing efficiency:

                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30765101/

                Results: Most of the sixteen reviews matching inclusion criteria demonstrated positive associations between diversity, quality and financial performance. Healthcare studies showed patients generally fare better when care was provided by more diverse teams. Professional skills-focused studies generally find improvements to innovation, team communications and improved risk assessment. Financial performance also improved with increased diversity. A diversity-friendly environment was often identified as a key to avoiding frictions that come with change.

                https://dinastipub.org/DIJDBM/article/download/2986/1924/12080 (This one is a PDF) CONCLUSION This study shows that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have a significant positive impact on employee performance.

                I also found this article from Harvard that explored practices that don’t increase efficiency, however, when they don’t work, the reason is usually unconscious bias and racism:

                https://hbr.org/2024/06/research-the-most-common-dei-practices-actually-undermine-diversity “These methods often exacerbate existing biases and fail to address systemic barriers, perpetuating organizational inequities. For example, diversity and harassment training programs frequently focus on blame, legal consequences, and unconscious bias. Employees are often told they are biased, and managers are informed that they will be held accountable if employees are accused of discrimination. This is counterproductive because employees tend to react with resistance and anger to these messages, inadvertently increasing discriminatory behavior.”

                The reason I am including this is that even if the end goal was to decrease efficiency, it would have to be the goal of management, not the regulatory bodies, because management are the ones choosing these methods, and if it were management’s goal to decrease efficiency, they would be able to do this without DEI requirements.

                My overarching point here is, while I understand your skepticism on DEI practices, there are much simpler and cheaper ways to perform the methods in the original post, making DEI an extremely unlikely culprit.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Report imaginary spies

    Sounds like a good way to get your buddy Bob taken out and shot.

    When fascists starts suspecting everyone as spies, good people die.