• null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I agree that we have a captured state - parties kinda cant really afford not to take donations from gambling companies.

    I also agree that it really sucks to have our lawmakers playing sports with these assholes - that just sucks. I think it’s also pretty tone-deaf.

    I also agree that it seems like this guy has performed this stunt for publicity, but I happen to feel strongly about this issue so I don’t really mind.

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      parties kinda cant really afford not to take donations from gambling companies.

      Can they not?

      Is spending so linked that its such a direct ratio?

      If so, how are you not already completely owned by corporations?

      Inherently then, anyone actually trying to improve the country must pick some lobbyist groups to exclude no?

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        We pretty much are “completely owned” by corporations, but you could argue about the extent.

        For example, I think we’re closer to Europe’s stance on big tech than we are to the USA’s.

        A captured state refers to governments that are dependent on specific industries, and all governments are to some extent.

        Gambling companies would provide a lot of tax revenue. They also contribute a lot of sponsorship / advertising revenue for sporting events. There’s also many millions of voters who enjoy gambling just how it is.

        In summary, its not only industry lobbyists, gambling is a deeply entrenched industry.