• n4ch1sm0@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Can we stop calling right wing billionaires populists? Because that’s oxymoronic, and full of shit.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I fucking despise how the media still calls grifters “populists” and make it sound like an evil word…

    Populism is a contested concept[1][2] for a variety of political stances that emphasize the idea of the “common people”, often in opposition to a perceived elite.[3] It is frequently associated with anti-establishment and anti-political sentiment.[4]

    Authentic populism would be the fucking shit, and the only solution that can work.

    For fucks sake, I don’t understand how populism wouldn’t be the natural state of every healthy democracy.

    • Severus_Snape@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Populists tend to reject political pluralism.

      They claim they are the ONLY ONES representing the people™. The danger is they can start attacking the media, judges… claiming that the people™ are on their side.

      Uncontrolled populism can lead to dictatorship. Even left-wing populism. Look at Venezuela.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Populists tend to reject political pluralism.

        Did you not even read my comment?

        emphasize the idea of the “common people”, often in opposition to a perceived elite.