• NeilBrü@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’ve been daily driving Kubuntu LTS for 3 years now completely snap-free due to --minimal-install, and use Waterfox, a Firefox fork that doesn’t use snapd as far as I can see. snap-free *buntu is alive and well. It doesn’t take much effort.

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      but why

      seriously. now you basically don’t have access to a large number of packages. sure, waterfox is a good alternative to firefox. but say you do want to install firefox (or any other package that canonical distributes only as a snap), what do you do?

      I get that it’s possible to run Kubuntu, or even stock Ubuntu, without snap. that’s the beauty of an open OS, you can do whatever you want with it. I just don’t get why you would want to run a distro that is actively pushing a standard on you that you don’t want

      • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        but why

        To explicitly piss off the distro purists and cultists.

        Jk😅

        Really, it’s because sometimes I like to run my experimental DNN applications on bare metal, and many of those use containers have an Ubuntu base.