• ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I may be totally confused but I’ve also always done it in that order, otherwise I feel like it would run upgrades from your cache of the apt repos (possibly hitting errors as stuff likes to change), then after it would run apt update (updating the repos).

      My thought has always been update repos, then check those repos for software upgrades. I could definitely be wrong though.

        • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yeah but shouldn’t the order matter? My understanding was that && just said 'after the previous command, run this… ’ so running upgrade before update would miss any changes changes to repos… From what I can tell update is required before upgrade (just like you have it), doing it in reverse missed a ton of updates for me.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Presumably running upgrade with the update flag is smart enough to do it in the proper order because there would be no point in doing it in the opposite order. Many other package managers just work like this out of the box. Homebrew is such an example. Running upgrade automatically does “update” first.

          • reggu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            If it were upgrade && update, yes that would miss the boat. --update is a baked in feature of apt upgrade, so it knows what to do ^_^