WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate has confirmed 48 of President Donald Trump’s nominees at once, voting for the first time under new rules to begin clearing a backlog of executive branch positions that had been delayed by Democrats.

Frustrated by the stalling tactics, Senate Republicans moved last week to make it easier to confirm large groups of lower-level, non-judicial nominations. Democrats had forced multiple votes on almost every one of Trump’s picks, infuriating the president and tying up the Senate floor.

The new rules allow Senate Republicans to move multiple nominees with a simple majority vote — a process that would have previously been blocked with just one objection. The rules don’t apply to judicial nominations or high-level Cabinet posts.

“Republicans have fixed a broken process,” Thune said ahead of the vote.

The Senate voted 51-47 to confirm the four dozen nominees. Thune said that those confirmed on Thursday had all received bipartisan votes in committee, including deputy secretaries for the Departments of Defense, Interior, Energy and others.

Among the confirmed are Jonathan Morrison, the new administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Kimberly Guilfoyle as U.S. ambassador to Greece. Guilfoyle is a former California prosecutor and television news personality who led the fundraising for Trump’s 2020 campaign and was once engaged to Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr.

  • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I mean it’s 100% fair criticism, honestly. The part where it falls down for me is where the solution always seems to be “Don’t vote for Democrats!” (and then leaves the room, walking proudly)

    Almost everyone in Washington is a piece of shit, although the Republicans are much worse. If you want to have another FDR, you have to have another several decades of labor movement before that, fighting for change from the bottom up. And then the political class is the last to come around, and they can lock in and extend some of the changes you fought for. “Democrats are POS” is mostly true. “Let’s get less engaged to politics / It doesn’t matter who wins the election” is a fucking horrifying reaction and plan to cope with that and make it better.

    I’ve heard many people on Lemmy say that they’re not planning to engage with the electoral system until the Democrats get better on their own. All I can say to that strategy is, better start looking around for where to move to that’ll give you the best shot at having a pretty comfortable ICE facility to call home going forward. And if you identify as any kind of anarchist / Marxist / anything like that, if you are at all engaged with any kind of counterculture or activism and you’re still in the US, you should probably be making plans to leave, because for you it will probably be much much worse.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They expect Democrats to cater to people who don’t bother to vote because nothing is ever good enough.

      “Bold strategy Cotton. We’ll see how it works out for them.”

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Considering the Democrats are a minority in every single branch of government, I’d say its a bold strategy on their part to continually ignore their own base in favor of the Republican base.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Correct, the republican base does not and has never voted for a democratic candidate in meaningful numbers. However, trying to be republican-lite does a great job of decreasing turnout with your own base.

      • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There’s that whole thing about everything in the US taking this horrifying downwards turn right around 1970, by all these different metrics, and there’s not really an obvious reason for it. I actually have one speculative theory on that: I think that in the 1968 Democratic convention, the Chicago cops beat the fuck out of a lot of the most passionate and engaged leftist activists the country had out in the street, and the lesson they took away from that (sorta reasonably, even though the Chicago cops certainly were not Democrats) was “fuck the whole political system then, I don’t care, I’m out and fuck you.” McGovern suffered his absolutely heartbreaking shutout in 1972, and the Democrats just stopped winning elections completely for the next 20 years, and eventually they learned their lesson and became Republicans. We went from JFK and LBJ to Clinton, and the new era of 1990s / 2000s horrors was born with no left representation anywhere in Washington.

        So yeah, I agree with you. There’s not really any reason to think that anyone in Washington would react to the electoral disengagement of the left by moving any direction other than right, and I think there is a good argument for a strong precedent of them moving far right and the whole country getting fucked over a barrel up to and including the present day because of it.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Clinton only won in 92 because Ross Perot split the vote. Obama (and biden) won because people thought they were going to help them, and were further disaffected when they turned out to be republican-lite. You can’t pretend dems moving right does anything but further disaffect their base. You have to really really loath your base to lose against a party as malicious and incompetent as the republicans.