NEW YORK (AP) — Three months after his release from an immigration jail, Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil is facing the growing threat of deportation for his role in campus protests against Israel.
In court documents made public Wednesday, an immigration judge in Louisiana ruled that Khalil should be deported for failing to disclose information on his green card application.
The decision marked a setback for Khalil, a lawful U.S. resident and recent Columbia University graduate student who became the first person targeted by President Donald Trump’s aggressive crackdown on pro-Palestinian activists. But while the ruling puts him one step closer to a final order of removal, it is far from the last word in the case.
For now, Khalil remains protected from detention and deportation under a separate judicial order. His legal team has said they intend to appeal the immigration judge’s ruling, which Khalil has characterized as “further evidence of retaliation” from a “kangaroo court.”
Reminder immigration judges are not real judges
So, what is the information he failed to disclose? That’s kind of an important detail.
Several paragraphs in to this article,
Comans then sided with the government on a separate claim, finding that Khalil had “willfully misrepresented” facts about his background on his green card application, including his role in a United Nations agency that provides services to Palestinian refugees.
Khalil has maintained that any omissions on the application were unintentional.
Also (I’m heavily paraphrasing but this is more or less from the article too) the judge’s response to “doesn’t it seem totally insane to call working for the UN a deportable offense?” is “I don’t make foreign policy decisions, that’s the presidents job and he cannot be questioned”
and he cannot be questioned
Literally judicial malpractice.
Immigration judges aren’t actual judges. They are in the executive branch.
Did I stutter?
The entire core concept is judicial malpractice!
An important detail… that is in the article.
The system never cared that he was wrongfully detained and deported. They only cared that proper procedure wasn’t followed while committing crimed against humanity. In short, they simply wanted the time and space to wave symbols of their power around before letting the fascist do whatever he wants. In this political climate, when two judges give conflicting orders, whose do you think is going to end up being enforced?
Being this cynical is uncalled for and doesn’t help anything. Most judges (not this one) care about following laws.
There is usually no judge around when people get detained.