• primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s really not something i consider worth my time and attention. I know your liberal programmed virtues tell you that supporting artists under capitalism with your dollar-vote is the done thing, but i don’t agree and won’t be wasting any more of my time trying to reason you out of such a convoluted position on something that barely matters.

    • flatlined@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You could play the world’s smallest violin for them. Couldn’t get paid for it apparently, but still.

      More seriously, we probably disagree and I won’t try to persuade you. Abolish capitalism and all that is preaching to the choir, but while we will live under it, if an artist you like has a direct way for your support (cash, bank transfer, crypto, whatever floats your boat) that doesn’t fatten music labels, would/do you?

      • primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Maybe, if it were convenient. Won’t be though, so it’s not something I’ve considered at length. They went after the archives though, and I think the entire concept of paying for media should take any hit that can be issued in retaliation.

        • KT-TOT@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 minutes ago

          “Some media company sued the Internet archive so now I’m not paying any artists for their work or the media I consume” is entitled bullshit. Esp after acknowledging many struggle to pay rent.

          Burn your CDs and listen to the silence. Maybe a thought will wander through your skull-cavern