The two-week temporary ceasefire has done little to quell GOP fears about the war in Iran costing the party seats in November.

Republicans are relieved over Trump’s steps toward reconciliation in Iran — but they worry the measures are too little, too late to save them from a brutal midterm election cycle.

Behind the public celebration by many Republicans of the temporary two-week ceasefire announcement, longtime party operatives continue to warn of a bleak political reality as the cost-of-living concerns around the war including spiking gas prices that are likely to continue for weeks if not longer even if the fragile ceasefire holds.

A person close to the White House, granted anonymity to speak candidly, put it bluntly.

“This war in Iran almost cements the fact that we lose the midterms in November — the Senate and House,” the person said.

  • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t have much faith in the Democrats. I’m reading Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States. It’s a great book, and everyone should give it a read. It basically sums up the entire history of America from a Liberal law professor’s point of view.

    … regardless. In terms of taxes, Democrats are largely responsible for increasing taxes on the poor and subsidizing the rich. They at the same time give weak concessions to the lower class, but these are flimsy enough to be overturned the minute Republicans are in charge.

    He summed it up in one sentence:

    In a two-party system, if both parties ignore public opinion, there is no place voters can turn.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      I like Zinn, but a lot has happened in the 46 years since publication (23 since last updated). Book remains a must read, but you have to remember that.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      In a two-party system, if both parties ignore public opinion, there is no place voters can turn.

      Yup. Combined with a few other things (e.g. gerrymandering, electoral “college”, citizens united) and our election system is basically a fucking scam.

      That is not to say that you should sit on the sidelines during the election, just understand that the game is rigged.

      • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Honestly, I think voting Republican would be the best course of action to further my preferred Democrat agenda. On the whole, the elections average out to be about 50-50. I don’t understand why, but both parties seem to seek equilibrium.

        Maybe the Democrats will be forced to make more popular policy decisions (i.e., universal healthcare) if they start losing by a landslide. Too many major losses would call into question the integrity of a two party system.

        • andz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Honestly, you smell like a coward too afraid to admit you want to vote republican regardless of agendas.

          Your bigotry is on display no matter how much you try to dress it up with what you probably think is clever writing.

        • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          The problem is that they wouldn’t see that as a failure due to not adopting a given agenda their base cares about, they’d see it as a loss due to people liking the republican agenda more, and they would then alter their agenda to be closer to the republicans.