• hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    At this scale, a geosynchronous solar power satellite beaming down power as microwaves actually seems chapter and more reasonable.

    You know, other than the single point of failure in space part. I guess it’s a bad decade for that idea.

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The impact of our incessant growth continuously erodes the environment, wiping out ecosystems for development and depleting our finite materials. Our growth mindset excuses ourselves of the “lesser evil” of renewable energy.

      Indeed this isn’t great for the environment and I’m again disappointed about this community’s shortsightedness in refusing to see it that way.

    • deur@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Tired of you people bitching about how the only large scale non-nuclear solution to our problem isn’t “great for the environment” when it’s the ONE thing that isn’t actually destroying the planet. Can’t have anything less than 100% magical perfection, nobody will ever please you.

      • womjunru@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I never said don’t do it, but covering miles of land with solar panels is obviously going to destroy that environment. I’m tired of people like you who can’t stop reading novels from sentences. Go reee to someone else.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Nothing people do has zero impact. But pretty much everything else has a bigger one. Coal will utterly destroy the land, and the gases emitted after it burns will destroy far more.

      Solar like this on a few percent of the land will supply all the electricity people need. So it looks huge, but is surprisingly low-impact compared with other options, or things like raising cattle

        • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Maybe one day fusion will finally deliver and we might have cheap and clean energy with no consequences to the environment other than a few big reactors in a country. But until that day arrives and we work that out we have to transfer and Wind, Solar and batteries are winning because they are cheaper than gas, coal and nuclear.

        • arin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Better solution is to kill off rich people. Less rich people = less pollution

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Tbh it’s better than strip mining or coal power plants.

      And in extremely hot areas, planting crops under solar arrays is a great idea, and can help more sensitive crops survive in areas where they’d otherwise get baked to death.