Welp…

  • buttnugget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The funniest thing about stuff like this is that there are already a hundred political parties in the US. Every time someone says “we need a third party,” it reminds me of that xkcd comic about standards and protocols.

    • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      When people say that they want a third part I doubt they mean it literally, as in they believe there are literally only two parties, but rather I suspect they mean that they want a third party which is large and influencial.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That is a ridiculous comparison. More political parties are a good thing.

      • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They would be, if the political and electoral system supported it.

        Which is obviously not the case in the US.

        • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think the opportunity is better this time around.

          Democrats and Republicans secured a two party system and locked everyone else out because of a few things:

          1. Finances and resources.
          2. Media coverage. During debates, they had secret handshake deals to only argue against each other, which forces media to only cover them.

          Musk got resources. He spent a lot to get Orange Man in power. And TV and news is already lower on the trust scale, as the population leans towards social media.

          There’s a few other issues like local/state elections that won’t be friendly to non-Democrat/non-republican parties.

          Of course, this is all a pipe dream and like the libertarian party, it’ll quickly get thrown aside and the politicians will fold into one of the two parties.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Do you think there’s any chance that Musk can break whatever is formally boxing out other parties? It seems like just by being who he is right now in history, he could break things.

          We need to hope he breaks the current norm in a way that doesn’t put him in power, and opens things up for proper multi-party elections in the future. That’s a lot to hope for though, I guess.

          When I think about this, I can imagine Musk fans telling tales of his 4D chess moves and how his plan all along has been to overhaul and improve elections. Or some other bullshit.

          • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Outsourcing your revolution to the billionaire oligarch has to be one of the takes of all time.

            Me: Can we have Lenin?

            Mom: We have Lenin at home.

            Lenin at home: