Know what? I take that back. I see your types of sentiment all over the interwebs and I’d like to know know more about you. Tell me why you feel this way.
YErSe it fErkiNg Is.
😆 lemme guess, you think it’s just a regurgitator.
What’s the equivalent of “Luddite” in this modern era, so we can assign the moniker to peeps like you"
So it’s a probability engine right? Based on a bunch of existing knowledge. But it still has trouble with logical fallacy. Unless I’ve missed something, I haven’t seen much improvement in this, maybe it’s available in private instances?
AI’s writing is easy to spot if you know good writing. It’s generalized 3 paragraph essay style in most cases (often expanded into 3-5 pages). It’s what a bad-writers idea of good writing is. Just like how Trump is a poor-man’s idea of a rich-man, weak-man’s idea of a strong-man, and moron’s idea of a genius.
I take your point though, it’s probably enough to take over, just like it was for Trump.
No it fucking isn’t.
Know what? I take that back. I see your types of sentiment all over the interwebs and I’d like to know know more about you. Tell me why you feel this way.
YErSe it fErkiNg Is.
😆 lemme guess, you think it’s just a regurgitator.
What’s the equivalent of “Luddite” in this modern era, so we can assign the moniker to peeps like you"
So it’s a probability engine right? Based on a bunch of existing knowledge. But it still has trouble with logical fallacy. Unless I’ve missed something, I haven’t seen much improvement in this, maybe it’s available in private instances?
AI’s writing is easy to spot if you know good writing. It’s generalized 3 paragraph essay style in most cases (often expanded into 3-5 pages). It’s what a bad-writers idea of good writing is. Just like how Trump is a poor-man’s idea of a rich-man, weak-man’s idea of a strong-man, and moron’s idea of a genius.
I take your point though, it’s probably enough to take over, just like it was for Trump.