Iran is just defending itself from Israeli terrorism.
No, that’s a war crime.
You mean like how Israel destroyed almost every hospital in Gaza?
Israel started this way. Now they are getting the same treatment they gave to Palestine or Lebanon.
Iran has the right to defend itself
Not by doing war crimes.
What war crimes exactly?
Bombing valid military targets.
I mean if you can’t even read the headline…
Bombing a valid military target is not a war crime. A war crime is something like killing prisoners or civilians. A war crime is like bombing civilian targets(like Russia does). A war crime is like when you starve a population with a blockade.
Please let me know what Iran did as a war crime, im really really interested.
Read the headline? Bombing a hospital it says, but I doubt you can read it better if I write it 🤷🏼♀️
Maybe there was Hamas hiding in there
/s
It was a colateral damage . Iran can’t do precise airstrikes like israel does
Then they shouldn’t have done it Einstein.
Israel: You dare use my own spells against me.
in a vacuum, if it was a dark comedy, it would be so funny how Israel complains about the things they have been doing non stop.
but it isn’t, because the major countries are acting as if they believe what Israel says.
Wait, so bombing hospitals is bad??
- some dude at IDF right now
it’s bad when Iran bombs hospitals because the IOF hides under them.
What if Israel and the Zionists didn’t commit genocide and initiate wars?
it would still be apartheid
It’d actually be a nice tourist destination, food is great, glad I got to go many years ago in between murder campaigns.
it is still an apartheid state.
I mean…
Honestly the whole “assassinating a leader is against the rules” has always felt ass backwards when the alternative is a shit ton of people with essentially no say in the conflict dying.
Let me take it back to Hammarubi.
All these shitty world leaders can just take turns killing themselves like the bloody Sneeches, until we eventually end up with leaders who think peace is worth a shot.
To me, that sounds like a self correcting and sustainable system. If a country’s government starts a war, the most likely result would be that political leader getting merc’d by the government of the country they attacked.
So you’re saying that Netanyahu is a legit target for the Iranians?
The only reasons I can see that monster is still breathing is the power vacuum left behind would make the situation worse, and the US would royally fuck anyone who tried it.
“Leaders can have a little assassination, as a treat”
Not too often, just enough to remind them of their humanity.
If a country’s government starts a war, the most likely result would be that political leader getting merc’d by the government of the country they attacked.
Depends on who’s stronger. I don’t think it’s gonna lead to stability every time, unless the leaders realize it’s better (read: profitable) to be at peace.
Depends on who’s stronger.
Now it depends on who is willing to throw enough bodies thru a meat grinder, bomb civilians, or nuke everything…
If assassinations on the table, none of that shit matters if you personally get killed before you order it used
Every aggressive country would prioritize personal defense and strategic assassination squads.
Which again, I’d see as an absolute win over thousands or even millions of people dying.
There’s no down sound.
What happens if one country invades the other which doesn’t posses the tech necessary to kill the leader? eg cruise missiles, bunker busters, or modern aviation in general
You will end up with leaders that will not meet each other or leave their countries. You will end up with leaders eternally paranoid that at any moment they could be assassinated by a foreign power.
This will be a guarantee for much more wars, killing many more people than we already have.
The problem with assassinating leaders is that it turns the population into a headless mob, and plenty of innocents suffer tremendously anyways.
Modern military technology has made such concerns much less important, as any conflict is increasingly devastating.
Yerp. Killing the leader leaves a power vacuum depending on the structure of the government. Power vacuums are the quickest way to a civil war.
Solve it the Klingon way: trial by personal combat.
Tough getting a spoon of their own medicine. Although the mullahs claim they were actually targeting something nearby, while the IDF just claims every hospital, school, or whatever to be Hamas HQ.
Iran did what they have been doing in Gaza.
No they didn’t. Iran didn’t bomb every hospital and clinic in Israel repeatedly, Iran didn’t bomb Israel fertility centers, Iran didn’t ambush and shoot doctors and bury their bodies, Iran didn’t drone strike ambulances AFTER coordinating their movement. Iran didn’t bulldoze graves of all the people it slaughtered to invade a hospital and destroy its water lines, Iran didn’t evacuate hospitals at gun point and leave infants to starve to death alone in hospital beds. Iran didn’t do any of that.
Israel did all that, and more, and they bragged about it very loudly and posted all the evidence themselves.
Ive heard a few Israeli spokespeople on the radio. Listening to their justifications is as hypocritical as it gets. Somehow strikes on Tel Aviv are the most despicable acts of all time while Israel is simply conducting the most glorious military operation ever. It sick.
deleted by creator
It’s not like iranians leaders don’t expect to be murdered. I am sure they have plan for replacements which may be smarter than thr current ones
they should do like Bibi and Ron away to Athens before the attack
