• atticus88th@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    “serious psychology test”

    Until someone from a different political party comes in and turns it into a “political party loyalty test”

    • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That would take a majority vote, not only a single party change. Our system here in austria isn’t perfect (like most of the world), but it is not the broken mess the US have.

      Regardless, i’d say the move to stronger regulation is welcome here. The shooter had his guns legally, even tho he was deemed unfit for military service, which screams “regulatory hole to fix ASAP”

      looks like there is broad support for making sure that whoever wants a gun to be stable enough to handle them without shooting up a school.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Soooo, we then just go back to handing guns to anyone?

      Sorry, but with that attitude we can’t improve anything. How about we just keep it a psychology test?

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Do you think that the average person is a killer but the only thing that stops them are the tools they have available?

        • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Should we every single person this planet access to nuclear weapons? Mutually Assured Destruction has kept us save from nuclear war thus far. Clearly this applies not just on the state but on the individual level as well.