Summary

Ukrainian officials were advised not to sign a U.S. proposal on accessing rare earth minerals, as it prioritized U.S. interests and lacked security guarantees for Ukraine, according to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

The document, presented by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bassent during a Kyiv visit, was intended as compensation for U.S. aid.

Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, Zelenskyy stressed any agreement must ensure both financial benefits and security for Ukraine amid ongoing Russian aggression, and Ukraine is preparing a counter proposal.

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Contracts like those always have extensive breach clauses for ass coverage for both sides.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      And who is going to enforce a breach?

      trump himself re-negotiated nafta and is now renegging on his own deal placing tariffs on Canada and Mexico

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        My first thought is that payments are staggered and if they don’t arrive the contract ends. Bog standard clause. Wild man trump isn’t going to risk American lives over enriching his mates. Americans wouldn’t tolerate it either.

        Having only local workers as part of the contract would also remove any boots on the ground to remove.

        Second one that occurred is WTO.

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Wild man trump isn’t going to risk American lives over enriching his mates. Americans wouldn’t tolerate it either.

          Surely you joke?

          • khannie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            No I don’t. What mother is going to happily send their child off to war over a contract?

            • Jhex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              No sure about the happily part but pretty much every modern conflict has been over stealing resources or political posturing

              • khannie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                That last part I fully agree with but very obviously enriching already very rich people at the cost of your child’s life (versus for example keeping oil prices low for the average Joe hidden behind a war of being the good guy aka gulf war 1).

                I just don’t see it happening. I can’t see the average US soldier and especially their parents rallying around “they broke our contract!”.

              • khannie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                One. Absolute best offer.

                Ok, ok. One bag potatoes too.

                Ladas only for early sign ups.