Democrats spent the last year asking where their Joe Rogan was. Hasan Piker is one of the few left-wing figures with the audience they covet — but the party is deeply hostile to the spontaneity and independence that make figures like him appealing.

  • Velma@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yep. And let’s not forget, just as recently as a year ago, Lemmy would ban people for saying “both parties suck.”

    Oh interesting. Good to know.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      That was almost single handedly the mod named jordanlund. He seems to have changed his behavior recently. Maybe.

      • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I can’t/won’t name names, but I will say, seems like ya were definitely around during those times!

        He does seem to have changed his behaviour a lot, as have many others. So not sure if it’s because of reality or trying to not get called out now, but it’s still refreshing to see positive changes when it comes to ban hammers.

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I realize I’m late so am just responding here for posterity, but - while I’m open to evidence - in my experience the people who were banned were clearly or very likely bad faith astroturf and propaganda accounts. They were clearly trying to split the vote, depress left turnout, and would just repeat LLM-generated junk rather than respond to any good faith debate.

      And I think the bans were right in retrospect because the timed (not typically perma) bans expired and those people still magically disappeared completely from Lemmy after the election.

      In the end, they probably did their job. Trump is in office destroying the country/world, and right now there are probably real people in this thread who think their “both sides” opinions are being censored in part because of the echoes of the noise those bad faith agents made way back in 2024.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        And I think the bans were right in retrospect because the timed (not typically perma) bans expired

        Lol, no they weren’t/didn’t.

        and those people still magically disappeared completely from Lemmy after the election.

        Lol, no we didn’t.

      • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        very likely bad faith astroturf and propaganda accounts.

        And that’s the same tired argument that was made then. Why do you find it so hard to accept that some people just aren’t onboard with either of the two main parties? Look around. Tide is turning. Lots of people on Lemmy now are open to third parties now. Are they all propaganda accounts too?!

        This is why you all lost the fucking election. Because you can’t wrap your head around the fact that you may be wrong about things.

        Facts: Lemmy had about 40,000–50,000 monthly active users worldwide in November 2024. There were 236 MILLION U.S. citizens voting-age. 154+ MILLION actual ballots cast. Third-party advocates made an even smaller slice of that already microscopic global user base. It’s utterly ludicrous for anyone to think that third-party voters on Lemmy could have split the vote or had any meaningful say whatsoever in the presidential election.

        Yet you are ok with them being censored because you were scared of them. How’d that work out? They were banned, and guess what? Trump still won. Again.

        those people still magically disappeared completely from Lemmy after the election.

        I was told I would “disappear” after the election. Maybe it looks like I did because I had to create a new username (not for ban evading–I actually blocked the instances I was banned from). But here I am.

        Am I a ‘propaganda’ account, still going, 2 years after the election?

        Not only that, but I see lots of people being accused of being alts of those ‘propaganda’ posters. So did they really disappear if their alts are everywhere? Hmmm…

        You want democrats to win the next election? Then pick a candidate who can win. You all lost to Trump twice. Think about that.

        Also, even if every single person who voted third party, changed their vote to Harris, she still would have lost. That’s how big the margin of her loss was. Lemmy wasn’t even close to making a dent in any of that, so to blame Lemmy posters for it is crazy.

        • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It costs next to nothing to include Lemmy in a social media astroturf and propaganda campaign, and is even easier and more effective because the small userbase means people’s posts are viewed less suspiciously (case in point: Your entire “the userbase is too small lolol” argument here). I am absolutely certain a few people I interacted with during that time were astroturf, MAGA-in-disguise or propaganda accounts. Re-read the part of my reply about necessary but not sufficient causation, to address your “third party vote” argument (I said nothing about third party voters, note, but you also ignore depressed turnout).

          But to get a little meta: I’m engaging in good faith discussion and giving reasons for my arguments. And you come here, respond to me twice (edit: three times?) with condescending derision when I wasn’t even talking to or about you, and are making an illogical claim that a 50K userbase somehow means Lemmy is immune from propaganda (whether state or individual). You then downvote me, which I didn’t do to anyone I disagree with here. It’s childish and petty.

          We are two people who probably want the same left-based outcomes and have disagreements on the method to get there, but you’re ranting to me about random things in this thread that I didn’t even say. You’re being extremely unpleasant, unkind and uncivil. I stand by what I said.

          Second edit: Seeing your profile and comment about being banned, here’s a direct question: Did you go by the username UniversalMonk prior to the election? The MO, aggressive response style, and AI-generated profile stuff is almost identical.

          • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Thread was under my comments in this thread, so I responded. No that was not my username. I had to change my username because of doxxing attempts and numerous KYS dm’s I was getting. From searching just now, looks like your person is still an active current poster. I guess he didn’t ‘disappear after the election’ either.

            I don’t use my old username anymore, and the instance it was on, closed. The person who told me to kill myself several times back then, and tried to dox me, is still around and still posts too. lol

            I haven’t been rude or uncivil to you at all.

            My profile isn’t ai generated. I’m here right now replying to you. I wrote my profile. Just because someone disagrees with you, it doesn’t mean they’re ai or that they’re bots or that they’re propaganda. Your comments are an exact snapshot of the time period I was talking about. So neither you or I left, and neither of us have changed our minds. Which means you believe in what you are saying, and I believe in what I’m saying. IMHO, neither of us deserve to be censored just because we don’t agree.

      • Velma@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The fact that you’re attributing the entirety of Harris’ loss on the vocal leftists online opposed to the genocide is absolutely ridiculous.

        • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          That’s a strawman version of what I said and I’ll explain why. First, I blame propagandists and bad-faith posters. That means, foreign actors paying troll farms, accelerationists, MAGA-in-left’s-clothing. Second, multiple causes can be necessary but not sufficient to an outcome.

          Did online propaganda of this type help Trump’s victory? Certainly. Was it a sufficient cause on its own? Probably not. But we’ll never know, hence the “probably,” which you’ll note is different from what you imply my comment said.

          • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            That means, foreign actors paying troll farms, accelerationists, MAGA-in-left’s-clothing.

            lololol For lemmy. Which in 2024, had 50,000 active users at most, compared to 236 MILLION voting-age U.S. citizens. And of those 50K Lemmy users, what, maybe 20 were advocating for third party. How much do you think someone would pay 20 people to post on a platform that is so small?! lolol Think about what you are saying.

            And they were banned, but what did it do? How did the election turn out? How do you think the election would have turned out if Lemmy didn’t exist? lol

            I wish someone paid me to post. LMAO

            Was it a sufficient cause on its own? Probably not.

            This is the correct answer. So censoring people based on their views wasn’t a great look for Lemmy. And it didn’t change the income anyway.

    • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, and especially before the elections. I was here mid-2024. Holy shit, you have no idea how crazy it was then. People on Lemmy were so blinded by NotTrump!!!, that they would pounce on anyone who criticized the Democratic party.

      I remember when Biden was starting to show bad signs of him not being all there mentally. Lemmy ignored it. Even during the famous presidential debate where it couldn’t be ignored that he was not fit, Lemmy downvoted and removed posts about it. Until finally, the tide turned and everyone started to admit it. Then the Harris choice.

      Now, it’s pretty ok to criticize about how Harris was picked and how badly the Democratic party handled it. But at the time, oh hell no.

      I remember being called a racist and a nazi for saying, “I don’t know about Harris. She seems kind of bland and parrots Biden, I wish we had someone more independent.” The shitstorm I got for that. People stalking me, downvoting all my posts, trying to find out where I lived, etc. DM’s that told me to kill myself. Every day. All because I said Harris was a bland candidate. lololol

      I had a guy trying to doxx me and find out where I lived by looking for clues in photos I posted of me walking in a park, so I had to change usernames and block all the political comms. Fucking crazy.

      Even tho now a lot more people on Lemmy agree with things that match up to what I said then, not one single apology. Not one. Some of the people who openly attacked me, now even say the exact same things I said then.

      I was “both parties suck” before it was cool. :)

      Now having said that, if the democratic party can find a young person, with drive and who’s independent and who really wants to changes things up, I could be on board. I like AOC. So her or someone like her would make me change my mind.

      But until that happens, nah…both parties suck. lol

      • Velma@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        That sounds eerily like Reddit at the same time. I was absolutely lambasted for speaking up about Harris’ messaging on Israel and such.

        Lemmy may not be quite as different from Reddit as we want to claim.

        • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Lemmy may not be quite as different from Reddit as we want to claim.

          Definitely not. In fact, we gotta realize that a lot of people are here because they were too extreme for Reddit. So we are like the nerdier, meaner, more anti-social reddit.

          I still like the idea of Lemmy, but the attitude of a lot of people here is turning me off. So many users seem to think censorship and exclusion are perfectly fine, as long as it’s the ‘correct’ side doing it. They don’t realize they’re acting exactly like the Republicans they claim to hate.

            • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Again, being called out on your bullshit isn’t the same thing as being “censored.”

              Me saying that I support third parties because I was unhappy with both democrat and republican parties, isn’t being “called out” on my “bullshit.” It was fucking censorship.

              I was called a nazi and a racist and a Trumper for saying that. None of it was true. How is that being called out?

              Do you realize that what you said about Harris in your comments, would have been ban-worthy back in 2024 just before the election? Do you think that’s ok?!

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 days ago

                Me saying that I support third parties because I was unhappy with both democrat and republican parties, isn’t being “called out” on my “bullshit.” It was fucking censorship.

                I was called a nazi and a racist and a Trumper for saying that. None of it was true. How is that being called out?

                Because of the way the US electoral system works, supporting a third party is equivalent to supporting the candidate you wanted least. You were helping Trump, in factual and objective reality, whether you admit it or not. And helping Trump means those labels fit.

                And having your feelings hurt because somebody accurately described what you did still isn’t censorship, no matter how much you want to pretend it to be.

                Do you realize that what you said about Harris in your comments, would have been ban-worthy back in 2024 just before the election? Do you think that’s ok?!

                LOL. I did say those things back then, and yet I’m still here. QED.

                • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  Because of the way the US electoral system works

                  Which you perpetuate by yelling at people, and trying to discourage them from vote third party. If every single person that was fed up, balled up and voted third party, then shit would change. But nah, you keep screaming at them and confusing them.

                  Not me. You don’t confuse me or scare me. :)

                  LOL. I did say those things back then, and yet I’m still here. QED.

                  I doubt you said those things in Oct and Nov of 2024. But hey if ya did, and managed to not get banned, good for ya. But lots of people were heavily brigaded and banned for saying stuff like that in October 2024.

                  • grue@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    Which you perpetuate by yelling at people, and trying to discourage them from vote third party. If every single person that was fed up, balled up and voted third party, then shit would change. But nah, you keep screaming at them and confusing them.

                    And if my grandma had wheels she’d be a bicycle.

                    Expecting a third party to win a US presidential election was straight-up delusional. Even when it’s Theodore fucking Roosevelt it still doesn’t happen! And that was someone with the name-recognition and supporter base of having already been President before!!!

                    The only way a third party could become viable is if voting reform happened first, by replacing one of the two major parties from within and getting it passed.

                    I discourage voting third party in the presidential general election! because it is objectively fucking moronic.

                    Not me. You don’t confuse me or scare me. :)

                    Refusing to be dissuaded from being objectively wrong isn’t something to brag about.

                    I doubt you said those things in Oct and Nov of 2024.

                    Fine, if we’re going to stop believing each other, then I think you were lying about being doxxed and have a gang-stalking delusion. Happy now?

                    But lots of people were heavily brigaded and banned

                    Another motte-and-bailey fallacy, BTW.