The New Zealand Parliament has voted to impose record suspensions on three lawmakers who did a Maori haka as a protest. The incident took place last November during a debate on a law on Indigenous rights.

New Zealand’s parliament on Thursday agreed to lengthy suspensions for three lawmakers who disrupted the reading of a controversial bill last year by performing a haka, a traditional Maori dance.

Two parliamentarians — Te Pati Maori co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi — were suspended for 21 days and one — Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, from the same party — for seven days.

Before now, the longest suspension of a parliamentarian in New Zealand was three days.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They also should have directed it to the speaker.

    It seems like a silly tradition, but it keeps things from getting too primally heated, and I would have been terrified in those lawmaker’s shoes.

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You would have been terrified? If you’re that scared of brown people, that’s your own issue.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Hakas are designed to be intimidating. If you don’t know that, you might be a Great White Savior yourself.

        You could argue that they should be afraid after introducing racist legislation, like they did, but that’s not where anyone is going here (yet).

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure, if you’re willfully ignoring context. These were legislators wearing suits doing it in parliament to make a political point, not armed warriors doing it on a battlefield. The only ‘fear’ was entirely dishonest and performative, not real.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            My goddamn family doing that to me in suits would scare me. They’re effective, and they did a good job performing it.

            Sure, at no point was there a literal threat of actual physical violence. If there was, I’d expect them to be barred for life.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        They all look like they’re doing poker faces to me, actually. But I dunno, maybe kiwis get used to hakas.

        You can substitute in any kind of menacing display you want - viking foot stomping, boo-rah and air punches - it’s not really appropriate to spring on someone you don’t like. Here there’s a cultural component as well, but they can’t really argue it was just that with the way they directed it.