What are some significant differences to expect when switching to an alternative, and can that affect gaming compatibility and performance?

    • Peasley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      my one critique is pretty subjective, but i find it difficult to find simple clear documentation online about how certain syntax works and how certain tasks are accomplished.

      Recently i was trying to set up a cron-job type automation to run a script every minute. I know how to do that in cron (and if i didn’t, there are tons of good resources online) but i had a hell of a time figuring it out for systemd. I also wanted to have the script run at boot or user login and i couldn’t figure that one out (but i know how to do it with cron)

      i’m not a power user so it’s entirely likely the information was hidden in plain sight and i completely missed it

      • Archr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        Were you looking at man systemd.timer? Pretty much everything you need is on there and it is not too complicated.

        • Peasley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          Thank you lol i will look into this next chance i get. I only remember looking at man systemd

    • ZombieChicken@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Age verification? How about their attempt, after taking over udev development, to drop support for other init systems to force people to use systemd? It’s track record of security flaws?

      • Tobias Hunger@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Filesystem enable age verification in pretty much the same way as systemd does: You can optionally store a user’s birthday. That is such a ridiculous statement.

        To be fair: None of the other inits cared for udev. None contributed or helped by providing features they wanted to improve udev. The systemd devs care for the lower level plumbing overall… and not just for the init system. So it is very natural for low level plumbing projects to land under the systemd umbrella today.

        Systemds track record wrt. security flaws is actually pretty good. Not many went through the cracks,maven though some were indeed pretty ghastly. Hardly any was in the core functionality, most were in new code not widely used yet.

        On the other hand, the service hardening that systemd enables has improved the overall security of a typical Linux system by quite a lot.