• OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    There’s nobody to speak for the woman either way. This wouldn’t be a clear issue in any state.

  • sarcasticsunrise@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Between molesting them, destroying Child Labor laws, trying to legalize child brides, and now this shit… when it comes to traumatizing children, Republicans are the GOAT

  • gaja@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Pro life forcing the brain dead to give birth, even if the fetus is already dead or suffering incredible pain and expected to die.

    • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      You wouldn’t want to MURDER that poor little fetus when you can source it to be born to SUFFER AND DIE like god intended.

  • Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I think the state needs to pick up the bill once they start interfering like that. If you’re going to be a monster, you can pay for it.

  • lowleekun@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I am sorry for everyone involved. It is exactly what repubs hope for however: women literally incapable to say no to giving birth to children.

  • floo@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Ghoulish, evil, and cruel. All of the trademarks of the Republican Party.

  • mel ♀@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Awful, it makes me sick. I hope all women can flee this shithole of a country.

  • thedruid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This is when jacking someone up against the wall and forcing them to do it, IS. The right call. Help the woman , for fucks sJe

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yes, generally if a mother was pregnant and now she’s braindead, it makes sense to keep her alive until her child is born, but if you read the article, the fetus suffered complications and is likely braindead as well, so it might be a stillbirth or just suffer and not live for very long, so it’s a bit more complicated

      • thedruid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        no, its not. In no case should a woman in this condition be forced to carry to full term. I am not trying to be antagonistic, I just really disagree.

        • ilmagico@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I guess I misunderstood what you meant. I stand by my words though: If a mother, who wanted the child, is now all of a sudden braindead, it makes a lot of sense to try to save the baby. This is of course not the case in the article, because the fetus is not in good conditions and probably dead already, so I agree in this case it makes no sense.