cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/50110241

Flock Safety, the police technology company most notable for their extensive network of automated license plate readers spread throughout the United States, is rolling out a new and troubling product that may create headaches for the cities that adopt it: detection of “human distress” via audio. As part of their suite of technologies, Flock has been pushing Raven, their version of acoustic gunshot detection. These devices capture sounds in public places and use machine learning to try to identify gunshots and then alert police—but EFF has long warned that they are also high powered microphones parked above densely-populated city streets. Cities now have one more reason to follow the lead of many other municipalities and cancel their Flock contracts, before this new feature causes civil liberties harms to residents and headaches for cities.

  • ganymede@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    oh look, the thing they told us would never happen when this shit was installed

    the creep is real.

    thought for the day: is thin wedge always a fallacy when it’s always fucking coming true?

  • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Flock Safety, the police technology company most notable for their extensive network of automated license plate readers spread throughout the United States, is rolling out a new and troubling product that may create headaches for the cities that adopt it: detection of “human distress” via audio. As part of their suite of technologies, Flock has been pushing Raven, their version of acoustic gunshot detection. These devices capture sounds in public places and use machine learning to try to identify gunshots and then alert police—but EFF has long warned that they are also high powered microphones parked above densely-populated city streets. Cities now have one more reason to follow the lead of many other municipalities and cancel their Flock contracts, before this new feature causes civil liberties harms to residents and headaches for cities.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Cities now have one more reason to follow the lead of many other municipalities and cancel their Flock contracts

    If it’s legal to install that stuff at all, it’s unlikely to stay left up to the cities. You have to expect that if someone (e.g. federal govt) wants it deployed, it will go in everywhere whether the cities want it or not.

    Cancelling contracts at the local level is useless in the long run. The stuff has to be banned by legislation.

      • solrize@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s NOW. As the stuff becomes cheaper and the voice recognition becomes more powerful, it will keep expanding like a corrosive gas.

    • Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      has to be banned by legislation

      The list of things that the legislature needs to do is a mile high, but things will only get worse and not better as long as fascists are running the show.